![]() On August 23, 2017, the victim was interviewed by forensic social worker Kara Finamore ( "Ms. was hurting a lot." When asked, "What did do that made you have to go to the hospital," the victim later testified, " e put his thing inside me." The victim’s mother then called the police. The same day, the mother took the victim to the hospital "to see if she had gotten pregnant." At the hospital, the victim stated that her "vagina. The victim’s mother testified that the victim had last stayed at her grandparents’ house on a Saturday on either July 21 or July 28. The victim stated that the contact occurred on a Saturday, when the victim had stayed overnight. ![]() The mother eventually got a new babysitter, and three days later, on or about August 21, 2017, the victim informed her mother that Appellant "had inappropriate contact with her" at her grandmother’s home. When the mother pressed the victim about why, she would just cry. While the record is unclear, at some point between July 21st and mid-August of 2017, the victim’s mother recognized that she (the victim) did not want to go to her grandmother’s house, but she wouldn’t say why. At the time of these stays, the victim was seven years old, and Appellant was seventeen years old. There were also some Saturdays that the victim spent the night at her grandmother’s home. A couple of weeks during this summer, the victim stayed at her grandmother’s house Monday through Friday. In addition to the victim’s grandmother, Appellant, his sister and his father also lived in this house. (5) If the general form of charging document described in paragraph (2) of this subsection is used to charge reckless endangerment under § 3-204 of this subtitle in a case in the circuit court, the defendant, on timely demand, is entitled to a bill of particulars.Throughout the summer of 2017, the victim was dropped off at her grandmother’s house for babysitting. (ii) contain a single count based on the conduct of the defendant, regardless of the number of individuals endangered by the conduct of the defendant. (i) include a count for each individual endangered by the conduct of the defendant or ![]() (4) A charging document containing a charge of reckless endangerment under § 3-204 of this subtitle may: ![]() (3) If more than one individual is endangered by the conduct of the defendant, a separate charge may be brought for each individual endangered. “(name of defendant) on (date) in (county) committed reckless endangerment in violation of § 3-204 of the Criminal Law Article against the peace, government, and dignity of the State.”. (2) A charging document for reckless endangerment under § 3-204 of this subtitle is sufficient if it substantially states: (d) (1) To be found guilty of reckless endangerment under § 3-204 of this subtitle, a defendant must be charged specifically with reckless endangerment. (c) A charge of assault in the first degree also charges a defendant with assault in the second degree. (b) If the general form of indictment or information described in subsection (a) of this section is used to charge a crime described in § 3-202, § 3-203, or § 3-205 of this subtitle in a case in the circuit court, the defendant, on timely demand, is entitled to a bill of particulars. degree or (describe other violation) in violation of (section violated) against the peace, government, and dignity of the State.”. “(name of defendant) on (date) in (county) assaulted (name of victim) in the. (a) An indictment, information, other charging document, or warrant for a crime described in § 3-202, § 3-203, or § 3-205 of this subtitle is sufficient if it substantially states: MD Crim Law Code § 3-206 (2013) What's This?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |